|
|
Post by GypsyMoon on Sept 29, 2010 10:59:05 GMT -5
Katy Perry and Elmo revamped her song "Hot and Cold" for Sesame Street.
The Video never made it to the Episode due to the fact some mothers said Katy was Dressed to vulgar for children programing.
I think the Video is cute and see nothing wrong with her outfit. When I was her age I used to wear similiar type clothing in neon colors the style was called "New Wave Punk" I think she is cute and tiny and the dress I think was adorable,
|
|
|
|
Post by claddaghlass on Sept 29, 2010 14:18:29 GMT -5
I don't see what all the fuss is about either.
When I was a little kid and would see people dressed in short dresses I'd ask Mom if I could dress that way someday. She responded with "When you're older" and that was it.
I don't consider myself to be "harmed" or "dammaged" by seeing people wearing short outfits on TV or in real life.
Once one thinks of it the kids would be much more interested in seeing what Elmo is doing.
|
|
|
|
Post by angelica777 on Dec 26, 2010 12:19:30 GMT -5
The video is precious! Katy's top was a little low , but not enough to ban!!! I wouldnt have even noticed if I had seen the video without knowing there was a fuss about it all. Katy Perry gets an A+ from me!
|
|
|
|
Post by GypsyMoon on Dec 26, 2010 14:23:07 GMT -5
There is a website that claimed that Katy Perry's outfit would have given male children erections. I think that they forgot that a Child doesnt have lustful sexual thoughts at the age of Sesame street viewers. There Target Audience is 2-4 yrs of age a child looking at a womans "full breast" at that age would be more so to View as lunch then a sexual thing.
Shame on them seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by claddaghlass on Dec 27, 2010 14:13:37 GMT -5
There is a website that claimed that Katy Perry's outfit would have given male children erections. I think that they forgot that a Child doesnt have lustful sexual thoughts at the age of Sesame street viewers. There Target Audience is 2-4 yrs of age a child looking at a womans "full breast" at that age would be more so to View as lunch then a sexual thing. Shame on them seriously. I facepalmed so hard that that. Kids that age really don't notice these things. Really! I remember being five and seeing a documentry on "wild children" and the reenactors were all in the nude. I just looked and thought "Okay" and waited to see what the narrator would say. I really did not notice the nudity. |
|
|
|
Post by GypsyMoon on Dec 27, 2010 16:46:02 GMT -5
Agreed I think the adults had more of a problem then children with this.
It was angry and uncalled for imo, People so seldom remember that artist are human also.
People anymore have attacked Celebrities in a very cruel manner. I have even heard people saying that because they make money and are popular should be attacked. They defend saying cruel things about these people because of there status.
|
|
|
|
Post by angelica777 on Dec 27, 2010 17:56:58 GMT -5
There is a website that claimed that Katy Perry's outfit would have given male children erections. I think that they forgot that a Child doesnt have lustful sexual thoughts at the age of Sesame street viewers. There Target Audience is 2-4 yrs of age a child looking at a womans "full breast" at that age would be more so to View as lunch then a sexual thing. Shame on them seriously. . my son said its a sign of you have" made it" as an artist/celebrity to appear on sesame street. I didnt realize the criteria was so stringent... |
|
|
|
Post by GypsyMoon on Dec 28, 2010 12:31:50 GMT -5
yuck! sickos... my son said its a sign of you have" made it" as an artist/celebrity to appear on sesame street. I didnt realize the criteria was so stringent...[/quote] And a sign you have "lost it" appearing on dancing with the Stars. 
|
|
|
|
Post by claddaghlass on Dec 28, 2010 19:06:22 GMT -5
And a sign you have "lost it" appearing on dancing with the Stars. Ouch!   I remember Mom saying that the show used to have big names on them now they're just grasping for whoever is convienent. |
|
